Email this page to a friend!

My Haiti Experience

 

January 12th 2010 saw the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere devastated by natural disaster. In the two years that have passed since this horrific day, people from all corners of the world went to Haiti to aid in the disaster relief and recovery efforts. Each person has a story to tell and their own experience from their time there. This is the story of Kelly Smith, a young English woman.

If truth be told, before Haiti was struck by the devastating earthquake I had never heard of this beautiful Caribbean country. However with the ever-advancing technological world that we live in, when disaster strikes it is only a matter of minutes before the world can watch the terror unfold. We all remember watching these images, and I like many others felt a compelling need to help. But what is the best way to help?

‘Donors gave a huge £106m to help people recover from the disaster which affected three million people. About 1.5 million people lost their homes, 300 000 were injured and about 220 000 died.’

The weeks and months that followed saw Haiti become less of a fixture in our media, yet it was images like these that remained in my mind. In the summer of 2010 – six months after the quake - I was given the opportunity to go and work in one of the worst affected areas, Leogane, a seaside town that was at the epicentre of the earthquake.

As excited as I was for the challenge that lay ahead of me I was also extremely apprehensive. I couldn’t help but think what do I have to offer? I have no relevant skills, I cannot build, I am not particularly strong and I have no medical skills. All I did have was the determination and drive to help. But was this enough? Well, All Hands, the organisation I was going to work with certainly thought so.

I had been to developing countries before but never to a country that had so recently been crippled by disaster; my perception of what Haiti would be like was completely different to reality. I envisaged entire areas, villages and towns to have been flattened. It was very harrowing travelling through Port-au-Prince expecting to see the entire city wiped out when in fact many buildings survived with little or no damage then right next door would lie a pancaked building. I found this much more disturbing and upsetting than I could ever have imagined.

The primary focus of All Hands was the removal of rubble and debris which was commonly known amongst the volunteers as “rubbling”. Rubbling enabled families to use the cleared land to erect temporary shelter rather than living in “tent city” before rebuilding their home; these shelters are the overcrowded roadside communities we had all become accustomed to seeing on the 6 o’clock news. It was clear to me that rubbling was the number one priority in Leogane, especially with the impending hurricane season, but unfortunately it did not take priority among the 50+ NGO’s who were based in the seaside town. Instead, setting up orphanages and schools seemed to be the “help” of preference for many organisations. But is this what the Haitians wanted or needed to aid them in their recovery and did anybody even stop to ask?

My experience in Haiti was certainly an eye opener to the field of post disaster relief. I have always been aware of the lack of accountability for international NGO’s but in my naivety

I didn’t think this would be the case in disaster zones. This raises the question: is all aid good aid – and it’s one of the reasons I’ve become a supporter of the Global Poverty Project.

I saw some amazing aid in Haiti, but I also some bad aid. I saw NGO’s competing without listening to what locals wanted or needed, I saw groups giving out goods that had been donated that just didn’t seem like priorities.

Despite this, with the help of international aid Haiti is making some amazing progress. There are many projects that are really making a difference. Working with and not for local communities; helping them to rebuild their lives, become stronger and more resilient. With the upcoming anniversary of the quake all eyes will once again be on Haiti. I hope this landmark will be used in a positive light; an opportunity to move forward and reflect on the progress that has been made.

Posted by Kelly Smith in Aid for column Action Stories on Jan 6th 2012, 15:12

Comments

05/03/12 4:52am - Posted By ryan - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Ian,Such a patronising rremak ought to embarrass anyone seriously committed to scientific discourse.Again you are pulling out individual cases to try to refute a probabilistic hypothesis. It~s like charities that only put positive examples on their website: you canb4t evaluate any of the claims when they select cases on the dependent variable. Let me explain it again as my first attempt was too quick. In the world there are rich and poor countries. Why are some rich and others poor? It's not war, bad governance, bad health, the influence of poverty itself (Sachs), because the rich countries had all these and it didn't stop them becoming rich. It must be something else. I think that terms of trade can explain it. The presently rich countries did not have declining terms of trade when they were creating their wealth, simply because there were no pre- existing rich countries to compete with. Yet for the developing countries the TOT have been declining progressively, whether for their raw materials like coffee etc, or for whatever manufactures they make. So in the majority of cases their international trade gets pidgeonholed into providing more basic inputs into the more advanced technical systems of the already-developed world. I'm sure anyone interested can find stats on the terms of trade between developing and developed countries, it's one of the main themes of the discussion. Try looking up the names Rafal Prebisch (economics), Wallerstein (sociology). Yes, some asian countries have done well in reducing poverty. In the cases of South Korea and Japan, this is due to USAnian aid combined with massively interventionist industrial co-ordination, in other words the retreat from the free-market dependency theory would predict would work. Singapore and Chile I know nothing about, however I get the impression that India is not a case of the abolition of poverty even in its minimalist definition. I don't have time to do case studies on the outliers you mention, and unless someone explains how they are representative of some alternative theory about how global poverty can be abolished, I don't see why we should focus on them.Seeing as I'm not going to get an answer from the experts for how I should distribute my money, I'm done here.-Joe
09/03/12 5:33pm - Posted By vetkgvw - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
ewfLzN <a href="http://nunfqkutmgty.com/">nunfqkutmgty</a>
10/03/12 9:43pm - Posted By sicpiub - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
1vcPTg , [url=http://htbwjsetahch.com/]htbwjsetahch[/url], [link=http://ifctthpojkos.com/]ifctthpojkos[/link], http://rplmxokxxbad.com/
12/03/12 10:32am - Posted By hyixoyrl - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
O0g4eS <a href="http://brzudrkotfci.com/">brzudrkotfci</a>
15/08/12 2:03pm - Posted By Kevin - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
I don't think the problem is necsycareily the measurements themselves, although they are of course imperfect, but the ways that we use those measurements. Saying such and such amount of children die from poverty every eight days is a depressing little factiod that you can tease out of the data. But its practical usefulness is pretty low, perhaps good for fundraising, but not helpful in formulating good policy prescriptions. As your question points out, dying from poverty is simply too vague a phrase to be really meaningful beyond mildly shocking people. Furthermore such formulations present us with questions that aren't worth answering (such as your first bullet point) and so waste our time (which is not a minor consideration).On the other hand knowing the number of people who live on $2 a day is undoubtably helpful in other contexts, for example in measuring economic progress, GINI coefficients, etc. The misuse of imperfect stats is a bigger problem than the stats themselves.
15/08/12 4:45pm - Posted By hmsesdlkart - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
tERpJE <a href="http://omuqeieingbo.com/">omuqeieingbo</a>
16/08/12 11:46pm - Posted By ekfotcbcqts - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
QaURmy <a href="http://htejlhrrshcj.com/">htejlhrrshcj</a>
19/08/12 7:09pm - Posted By mgygmbyrzzz - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
efP659 , [url=http://rlkjklywyggs.com/]rlkjklywyggs[/url], [link=http://dfuhmnreocdd.com/]dfuhmnreocdd[/link], http://ugiquytuvrdk.com/

Add Comment

Your Name:

Your Email (Not Displayed):

Please enter the code in the image into the box

Code:


Can't read the image? Reload